

If a deal is finalized, the football team will be the second minor league franchise to recently move into the arena. “I think it’s going to be a positive to the county, the city and the building,” said Herpich. No deal has yet been signed, but arena general manager Matt Herpich said he thinks indoor football will be a good match for Portland. The league is in negotiations to have a team play at the Cross Insurance Arena. Portland will be among several cities to host new arena football teams, according to the National Arena League.
Portland maine city skylines game professional#
While there are some swamps and marshes in Portland, I don’t think the city has turned any into a park.PORTLAND, Maine - Maine’s largest city will be getting a professional football team, though it’s not a National Football League franchise. The Fens and Casco Bay definitely aren’t equivalent. It’s not like Portland Head is so much more accessible from downtown than Boston Light. If anything, the back bay towers detract from the basin’s beauty more than they add to it.Īnd you were the one who brought up lighthouses in the first place.

Is the Charles River Basin technically a lake? Either way, I do think it would still be a stunning, natural feature even without the skyscrapers in the background. And even with the artsy black and white touch, it's hard to compare the Fens with Casco Bay and the rugged Maine Coast. Without the buildings, it's a pretty standard river. The Back Bay skyline is a great vista because of the towers soaring over the river. Of those photos, only one is real natural beauty (and those islands are not exactly easily visible or accessible for most Bostonians). I think you're conflating natural beauty and overall beauty. Having lived in both, there's no question that there's a lot more natural beauty close in to the center of Portland. But purely in terms of natural beauty, I have a hard time saying that Boston is better. If you want to talk a combination of natural beauty and built environment, I'd also give it to Boston. If you wanted to talk built environment, Boston wins easily. But it can't compete with Portland on the natural beauty front. But it doesn't have nearly as much that's so beautiful, so accessible, and so close to the city center. There are places on Cape Ann that are comparably beautiful, the Harbor Islands are wonderful, and Boston has great access to Cape Cod and beyond. This is only about 15 minutes from downtown. For example, this is in the city of Portland. But Portland is much smaller and sparsely developed natural scenery exists within and just outside the city limits.

Frankly, I think the built environment in Boston is infinitely better than Portland which isn't particularly attractive outside of the small footprint of the downtown area. Portland has no answer to the Fens or the Arboretum.įor anyone that doesn’t know the city very well, here’s a photo I took in the Fens around 2 weeks ago (specifically from the Victory Gardens):īoston has better urban parks without a doubt.

And especially if we’re just comparing city propers, Boston has far nicer inland parks. Casco Bay is nice and all, but the Boston Harbor and the River Basin are no slouches for natural beauty either.
